Connect with Tower at NWCDC 2018

December 4, 2018

banner for 2018 National Workers Compensation and Disability Conference

Our numbers speak for themselves. Challenging conventional methodologies, we pursue the best path to settlement with innovative solutions, like MSA Optimization, Simplified Medicare Conditional Payment Resolution, and Legacy Claim Settlement Initiatives.

Do you know your numbers?

What is the percentage of your CMS-approved MSAs which include prescription medication?

How often are opioids included in your MSAs?

What percentage of counter-higher MSAs are submitted for a re-review to CMS and how successful are those re-reviews?

What is the success rate for appealing Medicare conditional payment demands?

Without such benchmark analytics, it is difficult to measure the cost-effectiveness of your MSP compliance program and ways to better optimize your program.  Tower constantly defines, measures and manages the metrics that yield the best balance in care, cost, and compliance.

We have a variety of interventions that will optimize your claims outcomes — many at no additional charge. If the numbers above don’t convince you, then perhaps you need another number that will — 5420.

Visit us at Booth 5420 to learn more about what Tower MSA Partners can do for you. 

CMS to Keep $750 Recovery Threshold & Announces Upcoming Webinar on MSPRP Enhancement

November 29, 2018

$750 Threshold on Reporting and Conditional Payment Recovery Maintained

In a 11/15/2018 Alert, CMS announced that the 2019 recovery threshold for liability, no-fault and workers’ compensation settlements will remain at $750. Accordingly, Total Payment Obligations to the Claimant, TPOCs, in the amount of $750 or less are not required to be reported to CMS through the Section 111 Mandatory Reporting process, nor will CMS attempt to recover conditional payments for TPOCs of this amount.

By way of background, pursuant to the SMART Act of 2012, CMS is required to annually determine a threshold amount such that the cost of collection does not outstrip the amount recovered through such collection efforts. CMS’s calculations, which can be found here, resulted in the $750 threshold being maintained.

Upcoming Webinar on MSPRP Self-Reporting Enhancement

CMS also recently announced it will hold a webinar on 12/18/2018 at 1 p.m. ET to provide an overview of the self-reporting functionality that will be added to the Medicare Secondary Payer Recovery Portal (MSPRP) as of 1/7/2019. The webinar invite can be found here.

Self-reporting refers to reporting a no-fault, workers’ compensation or liability claim to CMS’s Benefits Coordination and Recovery Center (BCRC) which is typically the first step in identifying whether conditional payments have been made by Medicare in the claim. Presently, reporting can be done via phone, fax, mail or through the Section 111 mandatory insurer reporting process.

The so-called “lead” which results from this reporting is utilized by CMS’s recovery contractors, the BCRC or the Commercial Repayment Center (CRC) to investigate payments made by Medicare for the reported diagnosis and seek recovery for conditional payments made for the diagnosis. It is anticipated the expansion of self-reporting to the MSPRP will assist in expediting the Medicare conditional payment investigation process and perhaps improve the accuracy of charges identified as conditional payments.

Practical Implications

As CMS is keeping the $750 threshold for mandatory reporting and conditional payment recovery there are no changes to the reporting processes or determinations as to when conditional payment should be investigated or resolved.

In regard to the self-reporting enhancement to the MSPRP, as noted above, we believe this may improve the speed and accuracy of the Medicare conditional payment process. We will provide further information following the December 18 webinar.

Connect with Tower at NWCDC 2018

November 27, 2018

banner for 2018 National Workers Compensation and Disability Conference

Our numbers speak for themselves. Challenging conventional methodologies, we pursue the best path to settlement with innovative solutions, like MSA Optimization, Simplified Medicare Conditional Payment Resolution, and Legacy Claim Settlement Initiatives.

Do you know your numbers?

What is the percentage of your CMS-approved MSAs which include prescription medication?

How often are opioids included in your MSAs?

What percentage of counter-higher MSAs are submitted for a re-review to CMS and how successful are those re-reviews?

What is the success rate for appealing Medicare conditional payment demands?

Without such benchmark analytics, it is difficult to measure the cost-effectiveness of your MSP compliance program and ways to better optimize your program.  Tower constantly defines, measures and manages the metrics that yield the best balance in care, cost, and compliance.

We have a variety of interventions that will optimize your claims outcomes — many at no additional charge. If the numbers above don’t convince you, then perhaps you need another number that will — 5420.

Visit us at Booth 5420 to learn more about what Tower MSA Partners can do for you. 

 

Tower Opinions Sought

November 5, 2018

Tower’s expertise on MSP compliance and MSAs was reinforced by some good coverage last week.  Ametros sought the insight of our CEO Rita Wilson for its blog post “About the Evolution of Professional Administration,” which can be found here.  And, WorkCompCentral’s Elaine Goodman interviewed Chief Compliance Officer Dan Anders for her 10/31/2018 story, “CMS Shift on Lyrica Causing MSA Cost Concerns” available by subscription here.

Apparent Change in CMS Policy Expands Inclusion of Lyrica in MSAs

October 26, 2018

Vial of pills illustrating MSA Reductions in RX costs

Lyrica is a brand name only medication which costs $8.91 per pill at 150mg. Over a 20-year life expectancy, this is close to $200K in an MSA allocation. Until recently, CMS largely excluded Lyrica from the MSA on the basis that the diagnosis for which it is being prescribed, typically neuropathic pain stemming from a lumbar injury, is considered non-Medicare-covered. Unfortunately, over the past three months, based upon MSA counter-highers received by Tower, CMS has seemingly begun to add Lyrica where a diagnosed condition of lumbar radiculopathy is present.

CMS Policy on Inclusion of “Medicare-covered” Medications in the MSA

Pursuant to the CMS WCMSA Reference Guide (Version 2.8), CMS will include causally related medications in the MSA under the following criteria:

Medically Accepted Indications and Off-Label Use

 For a drug to be covered under the Part D Benefit, and thus included in a WCMSA, it must be used for a medically accepted indication. A medically accepted indication is any use for a covered outpatient drug which is approved by the FDA or a use which is supported by one or more citations included or approved for inclusion in the recognized compendia.

Off-label use is when a drug is prescribed in a manner that is different from the FDA-approved product labeling. According to Medicare IOM 100-02 Chapter 15 Section, 50.4.2 – Unlabeled Use of Drug (Rev. 1, 10-01-03) B3-2049.3, “An unlabeled use of a drug is a use that is not included as an indication on the drug’s label as approved by the FDA. FDA approved drugs used for indications other than what is indicated on the official label may be covered under Medicare if the carrier determines the use to be medically accepted, taking into consideration the major drug compendia, authoritative medical literature and/or accepted standards of medical practice. In the case of drugs used in an anti-cancer chemotherapeutic regimen, unlabeled uses are covered for a medically accepted indication as defined in §50.5.” There are many off-label indications that are listed in recognized compendia and peer-reviewed sources; thus, they would be covered under the Part D Benefit, and should also be included in a WCMSA.

For example, trazodone is approved by the FDA for the treatment of major depressive disorder but is commonly given off-label to treat insomnia. So the WCRC would include trazodone in a WCMSA if used to treat insomnia if it is related to the workers’ compensation injury.

In summary, based upon this criteria, CMS’s practice has been to include medications in the MSA when either their use is for an FDA approved diagnosis or for a medically accepted indication as found in the “recognized compendia,” namely Micromedex’s DrugDex database or the American Hospital Formulary Service Drug. CMS cites the example of Trazadone which is FDA approved for major depressive disorder but is used off-label to treat insomnia. Insomnia is a medically accepted indication found in the DrugDex.

Inclusion of Lyrica in the MSA

In terms of Lyrica, the FDA approves its use for the following diagnoses:

  • Diabetic peripheral neuropathy
  • Fibromyalgia
  • Neuropathic pain from a spinal cord injury
  • Partial Seizure; Adjunct
  • Postherpetic neuralgia

If any of the above diagnoses are present in a claimant’s course of injury-related medical care, Lyrica would be included in the MSA, if prescribed. CMS would also include Lyrica if a medically accepted indication was found in one of the two compendia.

CMS’s recent inclusion of Lyrica where it is prescribed to treat lumbar radiculopathy does not fit into any of the FDA approved uses or the medically accepted indications found in the compendia. While an FDA approved use is neuropathic pain from a spinal injury, a spinal cord injury is typically defined as traumatic damage to the spinal cord resulting in permanent changes in strength and/or sensation and other bodily functions. This is very different than the intervertebral disc degeneration or post-laminectomy syndrome which may typically be causative factors for lumbar radiculopathy. Consequently, it is unclear why CMS has determined Lyrica should be included for a diagnosis of lumbar radiculopathy.

Tower MSA has submitted Re-Review requests to CMS, but the response has thus far been their restating of the policy on inclusion of “Medicare-covered” medications in the MSA. What CMS is not explaining is how the policy applied to the FDA-approved uses or compendia identified uses for Lyrica establish the basis for inclusion of the medication in the MSA. The National Alliance of Medicare Set-Aside Professionals (NAMSAP), for which Tower is a member, has reached out to the senior CMS management for clarification of CMS policy toward Lyrica. As of the date of this article, no response has been received.

Practical Implications

As highlighted at the top of this article, the inclusion of Lyrica in the MSA can add a significant sum to the allocation. While CMS has yet to provide a clear explanation as to their actions or issue an official policy statement, the trend from MSA counter-highers points to Lyrica being included in the MSA when lumbar radiculopathy is diagnosed. As detailed above, Tower does not believe this is an appropriate interpretation of CMS’s own rules for determining whether a medication is Medicare-covered and thus included in the MSA.

Until such time as CMS clarifies its policy, Tower will continue to exclude Lyrica from MSAs where we have not identified a medically accepted indication, either as an FDA-approved use or as found in the recognized compendia. As our client, we will advise you of the potential of a counter-higher from CMS, but will continue to challenge any counter-higher we believe inappropriately adds Lyrica.

In terms of options where an MSA includes a diagnosis of lumbar radiculopathy for which Lyrica is being prescribed, they are as follows:

  • Submit the MSA and risk a counter-higher;
  • Settle without CMS-approval of the MSA;
  • Await further challenges to CMS’s Lyrica policy to see if there is a rollback;
  • Consider alternatives to Lyrica use; or
  • Await Lyrica patent expiration for a price reduction when generics become available*

*While Pfizer’s patent on Lyrica was set to expire in December 2018, the FDA has extended it through June 2019 based on a program encouraging drug companies to demonstrate whether drugs have a pediatric use.

We will provide any updates which provide clarification as to CMS’s inclusion of Lyrica in MSAs. If you have any questions, please contact Dan Anders at (888) 331-4941 or Daniel.anders@towermsa.com.

 

Updated CMS Reference and User Guides Reveal Minor Changes

October 18, 2018

Tower MSA Partners explains CMS updates to ORM and NOINJ rules in the Section 111 reporting user guide.

On 10/1/2018, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) released updates to the Workers’ Compensation Medicare Set-Aside (WCMSA) Reference Guide, the Medicare Secondary Payer Recovery Portal (MSPRP) User Guide and the MMSEA Section 111 Medicare Secondary Payer Mandatory Reporting NGHP User Guide. These updates to the reference guide and user guides are all fairly minor, having minimal to moderate impact on the associated CMS MSP processes. A summary of the updates is provided below.

WCMSA Reference Guide

The WCMSA Reference Guide provides for most CMS policies pertaining to the review and approval of MSAs. Version 2.8 of the guide provides as follows:

HICN Replaced with MBI: As CMS explains:

As required by Section 501 of the Medicare Access and CHIP (Children’s Health Insurance Program) Reauthorization Act (MACRA) of 2015, CMS must discontinue all Social Security Number (SSN)-based Medicare identifiers and distribute a new 11-byte Medicare Beneficiary Identifier (MBI)-based card to each Medicare beneficiary by April 2019. All fields formerly labeled as “HICN” have been relabeled as “Medicare ID” and can accept either a HICN or the new MBI.

Updated CDC Life Expectancy Table Link: While with this Reference Guide update CMS is not presently changing the CDC Life Expectancy Table used for calculating life expectancy in the MSA, CMS is updating the link which was outdated.

Revised Tables Pertaining to Verifying Jurisdiction and Calculation Method: In states where the fee schedule provides for regional adjustments, for example, New York, the Reference Guide lists criteria for determining the correct fee schedule rates to use in the MSA. CMS added an additional level of criteria and revised the table (9-1) that provides what is called an “Order of Precedence” in determining the zip code to utilize for pricing. CMS also added a table (9-2) clarifying pricing rules when claims are filed with U.S. Department of Labor Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs and states where no fee schedule is applicable.

MSPRP User Guide

The MSPRP is a web-based portal providing online access for attorneys, Medicare beneficiaries, insurers and authorized representatives to Medicare conditional payment information, the ability to dispute and/or appeal conditional payments and initiate the Demand Letter process among other tasks. Version 4.3 of the User Guide includes the addition of two new columns to the Case Results page providing for Case Status and Contractor, news fields which provide more relevant and updated information for claims awaiting response from the BCRC and three new warning pages to ensure information related to submitting redetermination, compromise or waiver requests is complete.

A notable improvement comes with the submission of Letters of Authority or Proofs of Representation allowing for third-party representatives, such as Tower MSA Partners, to act on behalf of insurers and Medicare beneficiaries. The process has been once a Proof of Representation or Letter of Authority is submitted through the portal the submitter would be required to wait a few days for the authorization to be authenticated. Updates to the MSPRP now allow authorizations to be uploaded to the portal with immediate authentication. As a result, the cuts down on the time to obtain Medicare conditional payment information.

Section 111 NGHP User Guide

CMS released Version 5.4 of the NGHP User Guide, which provides both policy and technical updates for the Section 111 Mandatory Insurer Reporting process. Notable updates are as follows:

  • As a result of Angel Pagan replacing Jeremy Farquhar as the EDI Department Director, new contact information is provided.
  • To ensure updates are applied to recovery cases appropriately, RREs are asked to submit the policy number uniformly with a consistent format. When sending updates, enter the policy number exactly as it was entered on the original submission, whether zeros or a full policy number (Section 6.6.5). 
  • The excluded and no-fault excluded ICD-10 diagnosis codes have been updated for 2019 (Appendix I and Appendix J)

Practical Implications

We do not anticipate the changes to the WCMSA Reference Guide to have any impact on either increasing or decreasing allocations on CMS-approved MSAs. As noted above, the updates to the MSPRP authorization authentication process will improve the turnaround time for obtaining conditional payment information. Finally, the Section 111 User Guide updates are all minor in nature and have minimal impact on the reporting processes.

If you have any questions regarding these updates, please contact Dan Anders at (888) 331-4942 or Daniel.anders@towermsa.com.

Two Tower Experts to Speak at NAMSAP Conference

October 1, 2018

Two of Tower’s MSP subject matter experts, Dan Anders and Rita Wilson, have been asked to speak at the upcoming National Alliance of Medicare Set Aside Professionals (NAMSAP) Annual Educational Conference. Dan will highlight trends in MSA reviews in a lively Q&A panel discussion on the new Workers’ Compensation Review Contractor, and Rita will be in her element –digging into data– when her panel compares NCCI MSA research findings with those of NAMSAP’s Data & Development Committee.   The conference will be held October 3-5 in Baltimore, Maryland.

Please see the following new release for more information:

https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20180927005765/en/Tower-MSA-Partners-Dan-Anders-Rita-Wilson

TOWER PUBLISHES WHITE PAPER THAT EXPLORES LIABILITY MSAS

September 26, 2018

“Lawyers are concerned that CMS may seek reimbursement from attorneys, injured parties and even insurers—or simply deny payment for injury-related medical care,” said Dan Anders, Tower’s Chief Compliance Officer. “Navigating through the Fog: Medicare, Future Medicals & Liability Settlements” recaps CMS’s process to date and provides advice to settling parties who are currently handling liability settlements. See more:

Tower MSA Partners Publishes White Paper to Guide Settling Parties on Medicare and Future Medical Considerations

Tower Publishes White Paper on Medicare and Future Medical Considerations in Liability Settlements

September 12, 2018

light blue car rear-ending a dark blue car

CMS has signaled its intent to expand its voluntary WCMSA review program to liability. While a liability review policy has yet to be announced, CMS has made clear it expects the burden of post-settlement medicals should not be shifted to the Medicare program. However, the measures settling parties must take to consider Medicare’s interests in these future medicals is anything but clear. Given the lack of guidance, how should liability parties address this issue so as to not run afoul of Medicare?

White Paper: Navigating Through the Fog: Medicare, Future Medicals & Liability Settlements

To provide background and guidance on Medicare Secondary Payer considerations in liability settlements–particularly future medicals–Tower has published a White Paper entitled, Navigating Through the Fog: Medicare, Future Medicals & Liability Settlements. In this paper, Tower Chief Compliance Officer, Dan Anders, Esq., provides:

  • Background on the incremental process CMS has taken in regard to a LMSA review policy,
  • Explanation of CMS authority to implement a LMSA review program, and
  • Guidance to settling parties on considering Medicare’s interests in future medicals at time of settlement and whether an LMSA is appropriate.

Liability Settlement Solutions

In addition to the White Paper, Tower provides a full suite of Liability Settlement Solutions for insurers, claimants and attorneys, both plaintiff and defendant:

  • Medicare Conditional Payment Investigation, Dispute and Resolution
  • Medicare Advantage Plan Investigation, Dispute and Resolution
  • Social Security Disability Verification/Medicare Entitlement Search
  • MSP Compliance Opinion Letter
  • Liability Medicare Set-Aside (LMSA) Report
  • Medical Cost Projection
  • Life Care Plan

Our compliance consultants are available to help alleviate the uncertainty and risks surrounding future medicals and Medicare. We will analyze your claim, recommend the best approach and implement the most effective settlement solution.

If you have any questions, please contact Dan Anders, Chief Compliance Officer, at 888.331.4941 or daniel.anders@towermsa.com.