Updated CMS Reference and User Guides Reveal Minor Changes

October 18, 2018

CMS User Guides for Section 111 Reporting. open book with colored page markers

On 10/1/2018, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) released updates to the Workers’ Compensation Medicare Set-Aside (WCMSA) Reference Guide, the Medicare Secondary Payer Recovery Portal (MSPRP) User Guide and the MMSEA Section 111 Medicare Secondary Payer Mandatory Reporting NGHP User Guide. These updates to the reference guide and user guides are all fairly minor, having minimal to moderate impact on the associated CMS MSP processes. A summary of the updates is provided below.

WCMSA Reference Guide

The WCMSA Reference Guide provides for most CMS policies pertaining to the review and approval of MSAs. Version 2.8 of the guide provides as follows:

HICN Replaced with MBI: As CMS explains:

As required by Section 501 of the Medicare Access and CHIP (Children’s Health Insurance Program) Reauthorization Act (MACRA) of 2015, CMS must discontinue all Social Security Number (SSN)-based Medicare identifiers and distribute a new 11-byte Medicare Beneficiary Identifier (MBI)-based card to each Medicare beneficiary by April 2019. All fields formerly labeled as “HICN” have been relabeled as “Medicare ID” and can accept either a HICN or the new MBI.

Updated CDC Life Expectancy Table Link: While with this Reference Guide update CMS is not presently changing the CDC Life Expectancy Table used for calculating life expectancy in the MSA, CMS is updating the link which was outdated.

Revised Tables Pertaining to Verifying Jurisdiction and Calculation Method: In states where the fee schedule provides for regional adjustments, for example, New York, the Reference Guide lists criteria for determining the correct fee schedule rates to use in the MSA. CMS added an additional level of criteria and revised the table (9-1) that provides what is called an “Order of Precedence” in determining the zip code to utilize for pricing. CMS also added a table (9-2) clarifying pricing rules when claims are filed with U.S. Department of Labor Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs and states where no fee schedule is applicable.

MSPRP User Guide

The MSPRP is a web-based portal providing online access for attorneys, Medicare beneficiaries, insurers and authorized representatives to Medicare conditional payment information, the ability to dispute and/or appeal conditional payments and initiate the Demand Letter process among other tasks. Version 4.3 of the User Guide includes the addition of two new columns to the Case Results page providing for Case Status and Contractor, news fields which provide more relevant and updated information for claims awaiting response from the BCRC and three new warning pages to ensure information related to submitting redetermination, compromise or waiver requests is complete.

A notable improvement comes with the submission of Letters of Authority or Proofs of Representation allowing for third-party representatives, such as Tower MSA Partners, to act on behalf of insurers and Medicare beneficiaries. The process has been once a Proof of Representation or Letter of Authority is submitted through the portal the submitter would be required to wait a few days for the authorization to be authenticated. Updates to the MSPRP now allow authorizations to be uploaded to the portal with immediate authentication. As a result, the cuts down on the time to obtain Medicare conditional payment information.

Section 111 NGHP User Guide

CMS released Version 5.4 of the NGHP User Guide, which provides both policy and technical updates for the Section 111 Mandatory Insurer Reporting process. Notable updates are as follows:

  • As a result of Angel Pagan replacing Jeremy Farquhar as the EDI Department Director, new contact information is provided.
  • To ensure updates are applied to recovery cases appropriately, RREs are asked to submit the policy number uniformly with a consistent format. When sending updates, enter the policy number exactly as it was entered on the original submission, whether zeros or a full policy number (Section 6.6.5). 
  • The excluded and no-fault excluded ICD-10 diagnosis codes have been updated for 2019 (Appendix I and Appendix J)

Practical Implications

We do not anticipate the changes to the WCMSA Reference Guide to have any impact on either increasing or decreasing allocations on CMS-approved MSAs. As noted above, the updates to the MSPRP authorization authentication process will improve the turnaround time for obtaining conditional payment information. Finally, the Section 111 User Guide updates are all minor in nature and have minimal impact on the reporting processes.

If you have any questions regarding these updates, please contact Dan Anders at (888) 331-4942 or Daniel.anders@towermsa.com.

Tower Publishes White Paper on Medicare and Future Medical Considerations in Liability Settlements

September 12, 2018

light blue car rear-ending a dark blue car

CMS has signaled its intent to expand its voluntary WCMSA review program to liability. While a liability review policy has yet to be announced, CMS has made clear it expects the burden of post-settlement medicals should not be shifted to the Medicare program. However, the measures settling parties must take to consider Medicare’s interests in these future medicals is anything but clear. Given the lack of guidance, how should liability parties address this issue so as to not run afoul of Medicare?

White Paper: Navigating Through the Fog: Medicare, Future Medicals & Liability Settlements

To provide background and guidance on Medicare Secondary Payer considerations in liability settlements–particularly future medicals–Tower has published a White Paper entitled, Navigating Through the Fog: Medicare, Future Medicals & Liability Settlements. In this paper, Tower Chief Compliance Officer, Dan Anders, Esq., provides:

  • Background on the incremental process CMS has taken in regard to a LMSA review policy,
  • Explanation of CMS authority to implement a LMSA review program, and
  • Guidance to settling parties on considering Medicare’s interests in future medicals at time of settlement and whether an LMSA is appropriate.

Liability Settlement Solutions

In addition to the White Paper, Tower provides a full suite of Liability Settlement Solutions for insurers, claimants and attorneys, both plaintiff and defendant:

  • Medicare Conditional Payment Investigation, Dispute and Resolution
  • Medicare Advantage Plan Investigation, Dispute and Resolution
  • Social Security Disability Verification/Medicare Entitlement Search
  • MSP Compliance Opinion Letter
  • Liability Medicare Set-Aside (LMSA) Report
  • Medical Cost Projection
  • Life Care Plan

Our compliance consultants are available to help alleviate the uncertainty and risks surrounding future medicals and Medicare. We will analyze your claim, recommend the best approach and implement the most effective settlement solution.

If you have any questions, please contact Dan Anders, Chief Compliance Officer, at 888.331.4941 or daniel.anders@towermsa.com.

TOWER MSA PARTNERS SPONSORS WCI-TV

August 14, 2018

Tower MSA logo with logo of WCI TV for sponsorship banner

Tower MSA Partners brings you WCI-TV, the televised coverage of the WCI Conference (Aug. 19-22). Be sure to tune into WCI-TV in the conference hall or your hotel or while shuttling back and forth for insights on the topic of Knocking Down Barriers to Settlement of Claims. #WCI2018

Read it here

CMS to Host Webinar on Benefits of Medicare Secondary Payer Recovery Portal (MSPRP)

August 2, 2018

logo for CMS

CMS recently announced it is hosting a webinar on Thursday, August 16, 2018, at 1:00 PM ET to “present the benefits of using the MSPRP.”  The webinar will also include an update on the new MSPRP features which Tower MSA highlighted in a recent article, Enhancements to MSPRP Improve Conditional Payment Processes.

A link to the webinar registration information can be found here.

Note, we attempted to register using the registration information provided but received an error message.  We are unclear whether this is a technical error on the past of CMS or registration is not allowed until shortly before the webinar is to begin.  We have requested clarification from CMS, but we suggest assuming that logging in is not allowed until shortly before the webinar is set to begin.

We encourage anyone who regularly uses the MSPRP or is considering using the MSPRP to attend the webinar.

Enhancements to MSPRP Improve Conditional Payment Processes

July 27, 2018

logo for CMS

Since its introduction six years ago, the Medicare Secondary Payer Recovery Portal (MSPRP) has increasingly become more reliable and useful in communicating to and receiving information from the Medicare conditional payment recovery contractors (BCRC and CRC).  Earlier this month, a revised version of the MSPRP User Guide was released (Version 4.2) and provided for further enhancements to the portal:

  • To reduce the number of calls received by the BCRC regarding the status of case correspondence, a new read-only Letter Activity tab has been added to the Case Information page, which displays correspondence that has been received or letters that have been sent related to a Benefits Coordination & Recovery Center (BCRC) or Commercial Repayment Center (CRC) case (Section 13.1.1).
  • To make MSPRP more consistent so that both insurers and beneficiaries (and their representatives) can request electronic letters, the MSPRP now allows insurers, recovery agents on the Tax Identification Number (TIN) reference file, and insurer representatives with a verified Recovery Agent Authorization, who also log in using multi-factor authentication, to request electronic conditional payment letters (eCPLs) for BCRC and CRC insurer-debtor cases (Sections 13.1.5 and 14.5.4). Note: eCPLs may also be requested on cases that are in bankruptcy.
  • To help Account Managers (AMs) determine which currently active designees should be deleted because of long inactivity on an account, a Last Login Date column has been added to the Designee Listing page (Section 8.3.2).
  • In cases where Part A, non-inpatient, claims do not have a HCPCS or DRG code associated with them, the Primary Diagnosis Code will appear on the Payment Summary Form (PSF), in bold, under the DX Codes column, along with an explanatory footnote. When the Primary Diagnosis Code is bolded, the HCPCS/DRG column will be blank (Table 13-8).

Practical Implications

Tower MSA staff often spend hours on the phone with the CRC and BCRC to ensure correspondence, such as an authorization, was received and that a matter is progressing to completion.  The addition of a Letter Activity tab confirming correspondence has been received and acted upon is a significant benefit as long as the recovery contractors properly update it with the most current documentation received.

Additionally, the ability for an insurer or Tower MSA, on behalf of an insurer, to request an electronic conditional payment letter (eCPL) provides for a more expeditious turnaround time in obtaining this letter which is otherwise sent through the mail.  Previously, eCPLs were only available to Medicare beneficiaries.

Update on New Commercial Repayment Center

Since the transition from CGI Federal to Performant Financial as the CRC contractor in February 2018, Tower MSA has encountered a reasonably quick turnaround time (Less than 30 days) in receiving Medicare conditional payment information.  Interestingly, in the first few months following the contractor transition the CRC had been issuing Conditional Payment Letters (CPLs), rather than the Conditional Payment Notices (CPNs) (The difference being that a CPL does not have a 30 day time-frame to dispute conditional payments, nor is it followed by a Demand Letter).  However, we are now seeing the CRC again issuing CPNs followed by Demand Letters.

While obtaining an itemization of Medicare conditional payments has been a smooth process with the new contractor, the same cannot be said for disputes and appeals of those conditional payments.  Our understanding is the new contractor inherited a backlog of these disputes and appeals and has been working through them which has added to the time needed to process new disputes and appeals (Hence the likely reason CPLs were issued rather than CPNs in the first few months of the new contractor).  Some disputes and appeals are pending for more than 60 days.  Additionally, there have been systematic issues at the CRC resulting in lost disputes/appeals, demand letters issued while disputes are pending and matters prematurely being referred to the Treasury Department for collection activities.

Tower MSA has been advised by Performant that it is continuing to reduce the backlog of dispute and appeal submissions while also addressing the systematic problems.  We are optimistic the portal enhancements and Performant acting to reduce the backlog and the systematic challenges will increase the efficiency of the conditional payment process over time.  Tower MSA will continue to monitor these processes and when warranted reach out to the CRC to request corrective action be taken.

What Gets Measured Gets Managed…. What’s Your Number?

July 23, 2018

man choosing form icond on a transparent technology touchscreen with a caption by Peter Drucker: "What gets measured, gets managed"

In today’s digital environment, if you are an employer, carrier or TPA, you are likely inundated with data.  You get claims data, medical and pharmacy data, predictive analytics, benchmark performance data, claim reports, drug interaction, duplicate therapy and contraindication notices, even drug triggers like poly-pharmacy notices, opioid utilization reports, and morphine equivalent dosage (MED) outliers.  You digest voluminous amounts of data internally and also receive a plethora of reports from your vendor partners.  With access to so much data, how do you aggregate it into its simplest form, drilling down to the information that actually shows how you’re doing?   Whether you call it ‘key performance indicators(KPIs) or use some other business term, the short answer is “metrics.

In the words of Peter Drucker, “You can’t manage what you don’t measure.”

As a company that deals with volumes of data internally, and as we work to support our clients’ efforts to comply with the MSP statute, Tower is all about metrics and continuous improvement.  Metrics drive internal efficiency improvements, workflow changes to streamline processes and the implementation of technology enhancements to improve our work product and turnaround times.  It’s also how we bring added value to clients to optimize MSA outcomes.  We define, measure and manage the metrics that yield the ”best” balance in care, cost, and compliance and we use these key performance indicators to reverse engineer MSA preparation methodology to continuously improve MSA, CMS approval and settlement outcomes.   We identify the metrics that drive the results we want to see.  We then measure our performance and modify processes, workflow, and technology to improve.

METRICS TELL A SIMPLE STORY

Step #1 is to identify what drives the results you seek to achieve. For example, in the case of the MSA and settlement, most would agree that pharmacy is the single biggest cost driver.  We’ve heard this from clients through the years and we’ve monitored this issue ourselves. Though prescription drug costs have come down over the past year, pharmacy remains the biggest concern expressed by payers when settling claims that involve an MSA.  Yet if asked, would you know what percent of your CMS approved MSAs include opioids, the percent of MSAs that include any pharmacy, or the average cost of prescription drugs on MSAs. You can manage (improve) only what you are measuring.

Measuring 2017 performance in Tower’s total book of business as it relates to CMS approved MSAs and pharmacy costs,

56.9% of CMS approved MSAs with ongoing medical had $0 allocated for pharmacy;

72.7% of CMS approved MSAs with ongoing medical had $0 allocated for opioids. 

We know what drives the results we want to see and we know where we are today.  We’ve measured these metrics for the past 3 years, and continue to monitor to see how we can improve.

ONCE YOU MEASURE, HOW DO YOU MANAGE?  

Tower’s clinical staff constantly examines current CMS performance against the latest state workers’ compensation statutes and associated fee schedules, then overlay this with CMS’s review methodology as defined in the most current WCMSA Reference Guide.   When changes are found, updates are immediately loaded into our system, verified and released.   Getting this process in place took a great deal of time, effort, and technology support, but it was key to our ability to measure performance.  Once in place, it’s now a simple verification, audit and sign-off process each month.

In addition to monitoring external changes, our system also benchmarks every CMS response against our internal best practices in MSA allocation.  This is done by reconciling every line item in every CMS response.  Through this software module, we know exactly how we perform against CMS in pricing, frequency, life expectancy, etc.  This information is stored in real time for every response every day, not via a month-end report or only when there’s a Counter Higher response.  Our system prompts our staff to review and reconcile each CMS response immediately upon upload.

Through our proactive approach to clinical and pricing methodology and our CMS response measurements, we avoid overfunding when we initially draft the MSA.  We are also able to reverse engineer to identify cost drivers and barriers to settlement as part of case triage.  We know which clinical and legal interventions can mitigate exposure because we have the historical benchmarks that measure these results historically.

In tracking CMS results over the past 3 years,

Our pre-MSA intervention model yielded CMS approved MSA savings of 61.4% when initiated before CMS submission.

We’ve also identified the documentation/evidence CMS requires in order to approve changes in medical treatment and reductions/discontinuations in drug therapy and we obtain this up front.

With historical benchmarks and CMS performance data, we can easily discern when we have a basis to challenge CMS via re-review submission, and we know what clinical, statutory and pricing documentation to provide to support our request.   In measuring our CMS re-review performance for all CMS counter higher responses received in 2017,

Average turnaround time for Re-review determination and submission was <48 hours and CMS Re-review success rate was 78.8%.

WHAT DOES THIS MEAN TO YOU?

When evaluating MSP partners, check out their numbers.  Find out:

  • Their success rates for clinical interventions and the average dollars saved because of those interventions;
  • The number of Medicare conditional payment searches and investigations initiated and their success rates for disputes and appeals, including total dollars saved;
  • How many Medicare Advantage plan searches and investigations they’ve conducted;
  • A breakdown of the percentage of CMS MSA approvals, counter-highers and counter-lowers;
  • Percentage of counter-highers submitted for re-review and their success rate.
  • How they leverage Section 111 data to improve accuracy with conditional payments and MSAs.

COMPLIANCE BY THE BOOK, CLOSURE BY THE NUMBERS

If the above resonates with you, I encourage you to check out our new website.  We’ve redesigned the site to better reflect our commitment to MSP compliance solutions, not just services.  Throughout the site, you’ll see metrics like those above, as well as many other key performance indicators that we use to measure performance, manage improvements and optimize outcomes.  You’ll also see specific case studies that demonstrate the successes achieved with MSAs, conditional payment negotiations, physician follow up and clinical interventions, as well as what our clients have to say about working with Tower.

For questions, or to learn more about Technology Driven MSP Compliance solutions, please email us at info@towermsa.com or call us directly at 888.331.4941.

New Medicare Numbers to Have Limited Impact on MSP Compliance Processes

July 12, 2018

sample image of a Medicare Health Insurance card

Since April 2018 the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has been issuing new Medicare identification numbers to some 60 million active Medicare beneficiaries. Pursuant to the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA) of 2015, a Medicare Beneficiary Identifier (MBI) is replacing the Social Security Number (SSN) based Health Insurance Claim Number (HICN) on all Medicare cards issued to beneficiaries. An MBI is a unique, randomly generated alphanumeric identifier which will no longer include any portion of a person’s SSN. The primary reason the identifiers are being replaced is to limit identity theft associated with use of SSNs in Medicare IDs.

The process of issuing new Medicare cards with MBIs is to be completed by April 2019. Medicare beneficiaries and medical providers requesting payment by Medicare can continue to use either the HICN or MBI through December 31, 2019.   However, as of January 1, 2020, Medicare beneficiaries and medical providers must use the MBI to access Medicare-covered medical care and when requesting payment by Medicare for such care.

Limited Impact on MSP Compliance

While the statute requires CMS remove the SSN from Medicare IDs, it leaves an exemption allowing CMS to continue to utilize SSNs for purpose of Medicare Secondary Payer data exchanges and processes. Accordingly, for purposes of Section 111 Mandatory Insurer Reporting, Responsible Reporting Entities (RREs), may continue to use SSNs, HICNs or MBIs post January 1, 2020. However, when querying a claimant for Medicare beneficiary status or otherwise updating a report, if an MBI has been issued to the beneficiary, then the response file from CMS will be the MBI, not the HICN.

In regard to communication with the Benefits Coordination and Recovery Center (BCRC) and Commercial Repayment Center (CRC), SSNs, HICNs or MBIs may be utilized to ID the beneficiary. Correspondence from these entities, such as Conditional Payment Letters and Demands, will include either an HICN or MBI, depending upon the beneficiary ID which was most recently reported.

As for communication with the Workers Compensation Review Contractor pertaining to MSA submissions, SSNs, HICNs or MBIs may be utilized. Correspondence from the WCRC/CMS will include whatever beneficiary ID was submitted with the MSA proposal.

From a practical standpoint, what employers, carriers and other payers need to be aware of is they will increasingly be seeing these MBIs from claimants and responses from CMS and CMS contractors.

Tower MSA Partners will continue to monitor the transition from HICNs to MBIs and its impact on the MSP process. Any relevant updates will be provided with a breakdown of the implications to your practices and processes. If you have any questions please contact Dan Anders, Chief Compliance Officer, at 888.331.4941 or Daniel.anders@towermsa.com.

U.S. Attorney Recovers Against Plaintiff Attorney for Failure to Reimburse Medicare

July 2, 2018

close up of judge's gavel with the scales of justice in the background

A Philadelphia personal injury firm and its principal recently entered into a settlement agreement with the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania to pay a lump sum of $28,000 for repayment of Medicare conditional payments. The June 18, 2018 press release from the U.S. Attorney’s Office explains that the law firm, Rosenbaum & Associates, and its principal, Jeffrey Rosenbaum, Esq., allegedly failed to reimburse this amount to Medicare stemming from nine settlements handled by the firm.

According to the release, Rosenbaum agreed to enter into a settlement with the federal government requiring not only reimbursement of the conditional payments but also to:

(1) designate a person at the firm responsible for paying Medicare secondary payer debts;

(2) train the designated employee to ensure that the firm pays these debts on a timely basis; and

(3) review any outstanding debts with the designated employee at least every six months to ensure compliance.

Rosenbaum also acknowledged as part of the agreement that “any failure to submit timely repayment of Medicare secondary payer debt may result in liability for the wrongful retention of a government overpayment under the False Claims Act.”

Practical Implications

This is another shot across the bow to plaintiffs’ attorneys warning them of their obligation under the Medicare Secondary Payer Act to ensure Medicare is appropriately reimbursed out of the settlement funds. Medicare regulations are clear in stating under 42 CFR 411.24 (g): “CMS has a right of action to recover its payments from any entity, including a beneficiary, provider, supplier, physician, attorney, State agency or private insurer that has received a primary payment.”

In regard to implications of this decision going forward, U.S. Attorney William M. McSwain said, “When an attorney fails to reimburse Medicare, the United States can recover from the attorney—even if the attorney already transmitted the proceeds to the client. Congress enacted these rules to ensure timely repayment from responsible parties, and we intend to hold attorneys accountable for failing to make good on their obligations.”

The provisions of the settlement agreement act as a roadmap for plaintiffs’ attorneys in ensuring Medicare conditional payments are properly resolved as part of settlement. For further consultation on Medicare conditional payment best practices in liability settlements, please contact Dan Anders, Chief Compliance Officer, at 888.331.4941 or Daniel.anders@towermsa.com.

 

 

Proposed PAID Act Intends to ID Medicare Part C, Part D and Medicaid Enrollees for Insurers

June 1, 2018

US Capitol dome

On 5/18/2018, the Provide Accurate Information Directly Act (or the proposed PAID Act) was introduced in Congress for the purpose of allowing settling parties an easy method to identify if a claimant is enrolled in a Part C or D plan or Medicaid.  The bill, H.R. 5881, sponsored by U.S. Rep. Gus Bilirakis R-Fla and U.S. Rep. Ron Kind, D-Wisc, requires the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to share information on not only whether a claimant is a Medicare beneficiary, but also whether the claimant is enrolled in a Part C Medicare Advantage (MA) Plan, Part D Prescription Drug Plan or Medicaid.  It also requires CMS to provide the identity of the MA or Part D Plan or state Medicaid program in which the claimant is or was enrolled.

The catalyst for this legislation comes from stepped up efforts by these various plans and programs, especially by MA Plans, to seek reimbursement from settling parties. MA Plans have largely prevailed against insurance carriers in seeking reimbursement under the Medicare Secondary Payer Act which has led to a heightened awareness of the potential for such claims and the need to identify claimants enrolled in such plans and programs prior to settlement.

While liability and no-fault carriers and workers’ compensation plans are now on notice of the potential for such reimbursement claims, there presently exists no universal method to identify a claimant’s enrollment status, short of asking the claimant.  Accordingly, the bill provides a solution by requiring CMS to share such enrollment information.

A review of the proposed PAID act shows the enrollment information would be shared through the Section 111 Mandatory Insurer Reporting query process.  In short, along with identification of whether a claimant is a Medicare beneficiary, the query response would also provide whether the claimant is or has been enrolled in a MA or Part D Plan or a state Medicaid program for the past three years and the name of the plan or program.  The insurance carrier or self-insured entity would then be able to readily contact the Part C or D plan or Medicaid program to resolve any claim for reimbursement.

The bill was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means and the Committee on Energy and Commerce for further action.  Tower MSA Partners will provide updates on the legislation when warranted.

Transition From Provider Resources to Capitol Bridge: 45 Day Update

May 7, 2018

stop watch reading "time for review"

On March 16, 2018, Capitol Bridge took over responsibility from Provider Resources as the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ (CMS) Workers Compensation Review Contractor (WCRC) (See New CMS MSA Review Contractor: Different Name, Same Policy and Procedures). The WCRC is responsible for reviewing all Workers’ Compensation Medicare Set-Asides (WCMSAs) submitted to CMS by providing a recommendation as to whether the WCMSA should be approved as proposed or increased or decreased. CMS then issues a determination letter based upon that recommendation.

We are now 45 days into the new WCRC contractor and have sufficient results from our MSA submissions to report on what has changed and what has remained the same:

Review Time: The prior WCRC was on average completing its review with a determination letter issued within 14 to 21 days from the date the WCMSA proposal was submitted. We were warned on March 7, 2018, CMS webinar introducing the new WCRC that the contractor would be using the full 20 business days allowed for review under the contract with CMS. Indeed, CMS was spot-on, as the time from submission of the WCMSA proposal to receipt of the determination letter now stands at approximately 28 to 30 days.

Development Letters: Development Letters, requests for additional documentation or information, are being issued between 21 and 28 days post-MSA submission, compared to nine and 15 days with the prior contractor. This is consistent with the overall review time of up to 30 days.

While the time for Development Letter issuance has increased, we have only found a slight uptick in the amount of Development Letters being issued. And even this uptick has been caused by Development Letters issued in error, i.e. request for documentation that has already been provided.

Review Policies and Procedures: On the March 7, 2018 webinar CMS advised that there would be no changes to their WCMSA review guidelines with the introduction of the new contractor.

The new WCRC has mostly followed the review guidelines, however, we have found an increase in pricing and frequency errors and the inappropriate addition of medical care on some WCMSA determinations.

Tower MSA can readily identify these errors through its Advanced CMS MSA Reconciliation System. Within 48 hours of receipt of a CMS MSA counter-higher, the following process occurs:

  • A line item comparison is systematically made between the Tower MSA proposed WCMSA and the CMS WCMSA determination to detect changes in pricing, frequency and the addition or modification of medical treatment and medications
  • Tower MSA’s clinical and legal team reviews the reconciliation to determine any reasonable basis for submission of a re-review to CMS.
  • If appropriate, re-review prepared and uploaded to CMS.

Client advised of CMS’s response and whether a re-review has been submitted.

The results and value of this process can be shown in two successful re-reviews from the past month:

  • WCMSA counter-higher as a result of a change in pricing of urine drug screens increased the MSA by $4,245. Tower MSA’s Reconciliation System identified the error in pricing and a re-review request letter was submitted.CMS responded by correcting its error resulting in a WCMSA amount approved as submitted.
  • WCMSA counter-higher as a result of CMS changing a shoulder arthroscopy to a total shoulder arthroplasty, a $23,901 increase to the MSA. Again, Tower MSA’s Reconciliation System, along with the legal and compliance team, identified CMS’s error and a re-review request was promptly submitted. CMS admitted that indeed while a total shoulder arthroplasty had been discussed in the records, the most recent recommendation from the treating physician was for an arthroscopy. The error was corrected and the WCMSA amount was approved as submitted.

In terms of time to complete a re-review, the new WCRC is taking between 16 and 21 days compared to the prior contractor which took between two and six days. The new WCRC should be credited with correcting errors when brought to their attention.

We also applaud the new WCRC for using the most recent state fee schedules in their review of the proposed WCMSA. While CMS guidelines require the most recent fee schedules to be used in the WCMSA, the prior contractor was often using outdated fee schedules, which were up to seven years out-of-date. The result was sometimes inappropriate counter-higher our counter-lower determinations from CMS.

Practical Implications

You can rest assured that if the new WCRC makes an error it will be identified by Tower MSA and a prompt request for correction made. In regard to these recent errors, we expect some of this is to be expected with a new contractor. We have already seen corrections made in pricing and frequency of allocated treatment since the initial WCMSA determinations received from the new contractor.

While Tower MSA will address any identified errors, we cannot change the WCMSA review time. As such, you do need to take into account the now 30-day review time in your settlement planning (and potentially an additional 21 days if a re-review is necessary).

All-in-all, the transition to the new contractor has gone smoothly, which is a credit to CMS and Capitol Bridge.

If you have any questions, please contact Dan Anders, Chief Compliance Officer, at 888.331.4941 or Daniel.anders@towermsa.com.