For the First Time, CMS Releases Key Metrics on WCMSA Review Program

November 9, 2022

person pointing out metrics on a posterboard to measure Medicare Set Aside

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) recently released data that provides insight into its Workers’ Compensation Medicare Set-Aside (WCMSA) reviews.  This is the first time CMS has released such detailed metrics.

CMS shared statistics for a 3-year period of 2020 through 2022 (CMS’s fiscal year ends on Sept. 30). The data compared proposed MSA amounts with the CMS-recommended amounts (what we typically call the “approved” MSA amounts).  The data can be found here.

 MSA reviews are down

In 2020 CMS completed 16,517 reviews and by the FY end of 2022, this had dropped to 13,752 reviews, a 17% decline.

The reason for the decline is up for speculation.  There may have been fewer settlements and thus fewer MSAs during the pandemic. However, NCCI’s data* show that claim frequency only declined by about 1% when 2020 and 2021 are considered together.

Another theory is that the reduction reflects a trend of settling parties choosing not to submit the MSA to CMS for approval.  Whatever the reason, there has been less engagement with the CMS WCMSA review program.

 Review Methodologies Remain Consistent

When CMS disagrees with a proposed MSA amount it issues a counter-higher with an amount it recommends for the MSA allocation.  The data provided by CMS show that the variance between total MSAs proposed versus recommended change was 13% (2020), 15% (2021) and 14% (2022). This consistency of result is because CMS’s WCMSA review methodologies have remained largely the same over the last several years.

Average Recommended MSA Is Steady

The year-over-year data show very little change in the average recommended MSA amount from $84,563.33 in 2020 to $81,571.75 in 2022.

 A Billion Dollars a Year

The CMS data show that the amount the agency consistently recommends for all the MSAs comes to over $1 billion annually.  However, this does not necessarily represent $1 billion in savings to Medicare.  Savings result when the MSA is funded in a settlement and the MSA funds are expended for injury-related medical care that Medicare would otherwise cover.

How Tower’s MSAs Stack Up

The release of these statistics gives us a unique opportunity to compare Tower CMS-approved MSAs against all CMS-approved MSAs.

Average CMS-Approved MSA (2021 numbers):

CMS:  $80,741                                                 Tower:  $54,956

Tower’s CMS-approved MSAs are 32% lower than the CMS average approved MSA

And if we isolate just the prescription drug component of the MSA.

Average CMS-approved Rx Amount in MSA (2021 numbers):

CMS: $20,916                                                  Tower:  $14,079

Tower is 33% lower than the CMS average for the prescription drug component.

These comparisons prove that Tower’s MSA allocation methodology along with our focus on cost mitigation through interventions, such as our Physician Follow-up service, reduce MSA allocations. Simply put, what this means to our partner clients is millions of dollars in savings.  These metrics also show that cost reductions can be obtained, even when payers choose the CMS MSA approval process.

The release of data on CMS programs has been a policy initiative of the National Medicare Secondary Payer Network (MSPN), to which Tower belongs. We are pleased that MSPN’s efforts have resulted in this release.

We also thank CMS for publishing these statistics.  Hopefully, it will become an annual report that includes more metrics on WCMSA reviews, such as the percentage of MSA proposals that are developed for information post-submission. It would also be interesting to learn how many MSAs are funded in a lump sum versus those funded via an annuity. In addition, MSPN is interested in metrics surrounding Section 111 reporting and Medicare conditional payments.

If you have any questions about this report or anything else on MSP compliance or MSAs, please feel free to contact Dan Anders, Chief Compliance Officer, at Daniel.anders@towermsa.com or 888.331.4941.

*See Rabb, W., (2022, May 11). “Claims Frequency Up for 2021, but Workers’ Comp Profitability ‘Unprecedented,’” Insurance Journal.

CIO Review Magazine Ranks Tower MSA Partners Among Top 10 Compliance Technology Services Companies

November 3, 2022

Pict of award congratulating Tower on its Technology

The honors keep coming. Earlier this year, Tower ranked in South Florida Business Journal’s Top 25 Women-Owned Business list and now there’s national recognition of our technology driven compliance services. CIO Review: The Enterprise Technology Magazine just listed us among its 10 Most Promising Technology Compliance Services Companies for 2022 and featured Tower in this article.

When our Co-founders Rita Wilson and Kristine Dudley looked at the Medicare Set-Aside (MSA) landscape back in 2010, they found it littered with paper and inefficient processes. Everything was manual. Few providers tried to mitigate costs. And MSAs took so long to produce that some settlements fell through.

After talking with prospective clients to determine their pain points, Rita and Kristie knew they needed to accelerate MSA production. They automated Medicare Secondary Payer (MSP) compliance and MSA best practices into Tower’s MSP Automation Suite.

Because the suite easily integrates with any claims system and gathers data needed to prepare the MSA, it immediately reduced payers’ administrative burden. For the first time, clients also had 24/7 visibility into the entire claim. They could pull reports and check the status of an MSA anytime.

The suite also prompts for next steps and missing data to help keep claims moving. MSAs can be produced in days instead of weeks.

Tower’s MSP Automation Suite was designed so modules could be easily added to quickly adapt to changes from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. For example, when the agency announced plans to impose high penalties for inaccurate or slow Section 111 Mandatory Insurer reporting, Tower built a dashboard to steer compliance efforts to help clients avoid these future penalties.

The technology helps us mitigate MSA costs and immediately implement CMS changes. It also makes compliance more efficient for Tower’s clients and employees.  It frees our professionals to concentrate on clinical and legal interventions to reduce allocations and focus on our clients.

One of our clients said,Tower MSA has been a great partner for us! I have been very impressed with their level of communication and availability to help answer questions. Their easy referral process and fast turnaround times are much appreciated.”

Naturally, we enjoy external validation from honors like the CIO Review recognition. But it’s a real honor to serve our client partners who are some of the most respected payer organizations in the industry.

We’re constantly looking for ways to improve, meet clients’ needs, and exceed their expectations. Please contact Rita Wilson, rita.wilson@towermsa.com with any questions, suggestions, or other ideas.

Premier Webinar: Care, Cost & Compliance Through MSA Professional Administration

October 25, 2022

details about Tower webinar about MSA Professional Administration

We rightly invest time to draft a Medicare Set-Aside (MSA) that accurately considers future medical care and, when appropriate, obtain approval of the allocation from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).

However, we don’t always dedicate enough time to address the MSA’s post-settlement implications for the injured or ill employee. This is a mistake. The comfort level the injured employee has with how well the MSA will be funded, its administration, and what resources are available to them after the claim closes often leads to their agreement to settle.

Tower MSA Partners is pleased to present this premier webinar on Nov. 16 at 2 PM ET which will feature special guest presenter, Nicole Chappelle, Vice President of Settlement Solutions for Ametros and Dan Anders, Tower’s Chief Compliance Officer.

The presentation covers:

  • CMS rules and options around MSA administration and MSA funding
  • Self vs. professionally administered MSAs
  • A step-by-step guide to how MSA professional administration works
  • Incorporation of MSA professional administration into a settlement agreement and expectations post-settlement

A Q&A session will follow the presentation, and you can provide questions you’d like us to cover when you register. Please click the link below and register today!

Register Here

CMS Withdraws Proposed Rule on Future Medicals in Liability Settlements

October 18, 2022

On October 13, 2022, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) withdrew its proposed rule on future medicals in liability settlements from review by the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA review and approval is required before a proposed rule is published).

While never published to the public, the proposed rule was expected to provide guidance regarding obligations associated with future medical items in liability cases. It was commonly believed these obligations would include the use of a Liability Medicare Set-Aside (LMSA), similar to MSAs used in workers’ compensation, in certain situations.

What is uncertain now is whether a proposed rule around LMSAs will be reworked and resubmitted to OIRA for consideration soon or whether CMS is closing out regulations around liability settlements and future medicals for the foreseeable future. This is the second time CMS has withdrawn a rule on LMSAs, with the first withdrawn in 2014.

Practical Implications

While the lack of guidance around future medical obligations to CMS may have frustrated parties to liability settlements, these parties could have been even more frustrated if CMS had issued rules. As it is, parties in liability cases continue to have much more discretion in determining how to best consider Medicare’s interests in future medicals at the time of settlement than do parties in workers’ compensation cases.

What should settling parties do, given that no CMS LMSA review policy or process currently exists? Please reference Tower’s “Navigating Through the Fog: Medicare, Future Medicals & Liability Settlements” as a starting point. Of course, always feel free to contact me, Dan Anders, for consultation at Daniel.anders@towermsa.com or 888.331.4941.

Related Posts

Proposed Rules on LMSAs and Section 111 Penalites Again Delayed

CMS Rulemaking Notices Provide Possible Timeline for Criteria on LMSAs and Reporting Penalties

 

Automation has its place, but it can’t replace people in MSP compliance

October 3, 2022

Technology isn’t everything.  It may seem hard to believe that I have said this because most of my career was steeped in technology.

In my past life, I developed automation systems for pharmacies and workers’ comp pharmacy benefit management (PBM) models. Rules-based adjudication platform allowed for automatic Rx fills for many prescriptions, but also supported trigger-based escalation for the outliers to request authorization or have an expert take a closer look. The time saved and convenience provided were astounding.

When we started Tower, Kristine Dudley and I automated much of the paper-intensive world of Medicare Set-Asides, and also integrated the 3 major components of Medicare Secondary Payer compliance, Section 111 Mandatory Insurer Reporting, Conditional Payments and Medicare Set Asides, into a single platform. I believe we were the first to do that.

Our platform, Tower’s MSP Automation Suite, was built based on state workers’ compensation statutes overlayed with WCMSA guidance, metrics-based KPI tracking and intervention / escalation triggers that supported MSP best practices.  By seamlessly integrating Section 111 reporting, conditional payment resolution, and MSA preparation into a single, all-encompassing system, our MSP Automation Suite ensures that nothing drops through the cracks, no field goes unpopulated, problem cases can be identified, and deadlines are met.

Tower’s MSP Automation Suite captures, stores and manages all data points, integrates with ANY claims system, enables clients’ business rules to be overlaid onto ours, and gives our clients end-to-end visibility into Medicare and claim information.  Our system also leverages embedded triggers to escalate medical and pharmacy issues, prompting a review for intervention. In short, Tower’s MSP Automation Suite leverages the best of automation until technology intersects with the need for expertise.  This allows our team to manage, track and drive MSP compliance from the moment a Medicare beneficiary is identified through the claim’s closure.

Do we love automation?  You bet we do.

But we realize automation can’t do everything. MSP compliance has always – and will always – require a high degree of consultative expertise. You can’t just capture and populate data fields, and automatically “pop” out an MSA that supports aggressive cost mitigation that is both CMS-approvable and facilitates settlement.

While many workers’ compensation claims move through the system seamlessly, others are “messy”.  Body parts may be denied, additional claims may exist, co-morbid conditions may complicate treatment, surgeries, medical treatment and medications may be prescribed inappropriately or ICD10 codes may be too general or inconsistent with the treatment being paid by the carrier.  These are just a subset of the rules-based triggers built into our system so that claims warranting attention are automatically escalated to a human expert to dig through files, examine causation questions, and probe open-ended medical care and contradictory medical records.

Clients need their calls, emails and questions answered by real people, and quickly. Complex conditional payment matters call for conversations … with a knowledgeable partner who shares your goals.

Our automated system escalates medical and pharmacy issues, but then you need a professional with specialized knowledge and experience to recommend the best intervention.  And to implement it.

One of our most effective interventions created by Tower is our Physician Follow-up. Guess what? This is performed by people, people who have the patience and commitment to keep trying to talk to the provider. If you’ve tried to call and talk to your own doctor lately, you know what a challenge this can be.

These professionals have the knowledge and soft skills needed to delicately point out vague notes and open-ended recommendations in medical records. And they must be able to persuade the provider to clarify their treatment and prescriptions. Drafting a jurisdiction-specific statement for the provider to sign requires yet another human skill set.

If I had to name the one aspect that drives Tower’s success, I’d have to say service.  Our technology enables us to respond quickly, anticipate issues, and proactively address them, but it’s the people, their attitudes, and their expertise our clients value the most. 

The common thread in our client testimonies are service and partnership. Clients are “very impressed with [Tower’s] level of communication and availability to help answer questions,” and they say, “they truly listen; listen to understand and not just to respond.”

Perhaps this person sums things best: “They have advanced technology and certified specialists to ensure no stone is unturned.”

Insurance carriers, self-insureds and TPAs are dealing with shortfalls in staffing.  There’s more pressure on the experienced adjusters, and the new hires need all kinds of support to get up to speed on MSP matters.  Tower MSA Partners is here to help. That’s what the Partners part of our name means.

We are proud of our technology, and we recognize when to leverage it and when automation must give way to consultative expertise. There is a need for partnership with real people who care about your claim closure and settlement and can ensure that happens with the right balance of care, cost and compliance.

If you have any questions or just want to talk about partnership opportunities, the expertise of our people, or our technological capabilities contact me at rita.wilson@towermsa.com.

Tower MSA Partners’ WCI-TV Interviews Reveal How Workers’ Compensation Companies Use Claims Data

August 19, 2022

WCI TV logo for ads on Data analytics

The workers’ compensation industry has extolled the promises of data analytics and automation for years.

But how are organizations really using claims data?  What strategies have worked best? And what have they learned?  Several executives will share their experiences during WCI-TV interviews sponsored by Tower MSA Partners.

Guests include Dave Strange, the Yellow Corporation’s Workers’ Compensation Manager and Greg Hamlin, Senior Vice President, Resolution with Berkley Industrial Comp. Ametros CEO Porter Leslie and Alisa Hofman, Vice President of Workers’ Compensation and Medicare Practices for Arcadia will discuss the use of data during and after settlement.

In addition, Tower’s Chief Compliance Officer Dan Anders and Chief Operations Officer Kristine Dudley will share how the technology driven company uses data to streamline Medicare Secondary Payer compliance, protect clients from penalties, and optimize Medicare Set-Asides.

Tower has been the exclusive sponsor of WCI-TV since it first aired in 2015. WCI-TV airs throughout the convention center, in hotel guest rooms and shuttles, on You Tube and CI’s website. Tower’s interviews will also be shared on the company’s LinkedIn page.

 The 76th Annual WCI Conference will be held August 21-24 at the Orlando World Center Marriott. For more information, please see https://www.wci360.com/conference/.

 

Is a CMS-approved $0 MSA Still Possible?

July 26, 2022

Picture of a women holding the # 0 depicting a $0 Medicare Set-Aside

A common question we receive is whether a CMS-approved $0 MSA is still possible.  The answer is, yes– if it meets the criteria.

There are three different ways a $0 MSA can be obtained, each with its own criteria and documentation requirements.

Denied Claim $0 MSA

This is a $0 MSA based on a completely denied workers’ comp claim when no payments have been made for medical treatment or indemnity.  In certain jurisdictions, such as California, some medical payments can have been made during a statutory investigating period. Payments for non-treatment purposes such as IMEs, case management and medical records copies do not impact the ability to obtain a $0 MSA approval.

This type of $0 MSA has significant documentation requirements:

1. Claim Payment History

  • A claim payment history printout, even if blank, representing payments since the inception of the claim. All payments must be itemized.
  • Printout must be divided into categories for medical, indemnity and expenses with subtotals for each category and a grand total listed. This printout needs to include the print or run date.
  • If the claim payment history does not meet the above requirements, then Tower will work with you to identify alternative documentation that meets CMS requirements.

2. Draft or final settlement documents and court orders or rulings or a statement that no such documents exist (see below Financial Detail and Denial Letter). CMS recently added a requirement that there must be a proposed or agreed-to settlement.  Importantly, while CMS requires a proposed settlement, it will reject the $0 MSA if the settlement is finalized, for example with court or commission approval, before CMS’s review and approval of the $0 MSA.

3. First Report of Injury or a statement that no such document exists (See below Financial Detail and Denial Letter).

4. Financial Detail and Denial Letter – At the time of submission Tower will draft a letter for the client to sign that confirms the denial of the claim and any other necessary explanations, such as why no First Report of Injury is available.

5.  Medical Records:  As with a regular MSA, medical records for the past two years must be provided with the submission.

6. CMS Consent to Release form executed by the claimant.

Accepted Claim $0 MSA 

This is a $0 MSA based on medical documentation supporting no further need for injury-related treatment.  In the WCMSA Reference Guide, CMS provides as follows:

The individual’s treating physicians conclude (in writing) that to a reasonable degree of medical certainty the individual will no longer require any Medicare-covered treatments related to the WC injury.

In practice, CMS accepts treating physician statements that say the injury-related treatment has resolved or returned to baseline (when there was a pre-existing condition) and that no further injury-related treatment will be necessary as sufficient to support the $0 MSA.

Keep in mind that CMS will not accept the physician’s statement unless it is consistent with the treatment records/notes.  For example, if the physician states the injury-related has resolved, but treatment notes document ongoing pain to the relevant body part, CMS is unlikely to approve a $0 MSA.  Also, if the injured worker will require a revision or replacement to a body part, e.g., a knee replacement, a $0 MSA will not be approved.

In addition to the physician statement, a claim payment history, medical treatment records and an executed Consent to Release are required.

Judicial Decision $0 MSA

CMS will accept a judicial decision after a hearing on the merits of the case as a basis for a $0 MSA.  This can be on a completely denied claim where the judge upholds the denial of the claim or an accepted claim where the judge finds future medical treatment, if any, is unrelated to the work injury.  The key here is the decision is “on the merits.”  If it in any way looks like an agreement between the parties and the judge just stamped their approval, CMS will not accept it.

In addition to the judicial decision, a claim payment history, medical treatment records and an executed Consent to Release are required.

While there are strict documentation requirements, these $0 MSA approvals remain available for workers’ compensation cases meeting the applicable criteria. Please contact Tower MSA Partners at referrals@towermsa.com or (888) 331-4941 to refer a claim meeting these requirements or for further consultation.

Catch Tower’s Dan Anders on the popular ADJUSTED podcast

July 13, 2022

Dan Anders who was quoted in the Claims Journal

The latest episode of the popular ADJUSTED podcast features our Chief Compliance Officer Dan Anders on one of his favorite topics, Medicare Set-Asides. When are they needed? How do you mitigate their costs? What’s the deal with rated ages? Host Greg Hamlin and Guest-host Matt Yehling, Director of Claims at Midwest Employers Casualty wanted to know.

The hosts posed the all-important question of when should workers’ comp claim with a Medicare beneficiary claimant be settled: now, later or not at all? Dan guides listeners through the various elements to consider when coming to this decision. Is the Medicare beneficiary’s condition stable? Is surgery imminent? Are they still tapering off certain medications? Are there ways to lower costs without compromising care? What are the barriers to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) approval?

While talking about ways to mitigate costs, Dan stresses the need to obtain physician statements to clarify treatment, including which medications are discontinued. CMS requires the costs for these to be included in the MSA unless changes are documented in certain ways. Tower’s Physician Follow-up service does this and has been used on nearly half of our CMS-submitted MSAs.

If you’re new to MSAs or need to know more about reducing their costs, this podcast is for you. Find it on Apple, Google, Spotify, other platforms and here: Medicare Set Asides with Dan Anders (buzzsprout.com).

Even better, you’ll learn a little more about Dan. Did you know he considered a career in politics?

Produced by Berkley Industrial Comp, ADJUSTED presents interviews with experts on a variety of topics touching workers’ comp. Other recent episodes on settlement issues were Ametros’ Andrea Wells and Brad Cantwell with Arcadia Structured Settlements. Visit the Berkley Industrial Comp blog for these and more.

MSAs are complicated and confusing—they even stump the specialists at times. Sometimes you just need to talk to an expert in a certain area. If you ever have a question about an MSA, Dan is happy to talk to you. Get in touch with him at Daniel.anders@towermsa.com.

Related posts

Premier Webinar: Tricks of the Trade for Successful MSA Outcomes

Medicare Set-Asides

Premier Webinar: Tricks of the Trade for Successful MSA Outcomes

July 5, 2022

details about webinar on MSA outcomes

Not all Medicare Set-Asides (MSAs) are the same. There are specialty areas for unusual cases and many questions about these:

  • Criteria for successful $0 MSA approvals
  • Whether to include PQMEs, AMEs, IMEs in the MSA
  • Use of court orders to limit medical care in the MSA
  • When and how to use the MSA Amended Review process
  • Correct verbiage for treating physician statements

Claims professionals and attorneys often receive conflicting or unclear information around these topics and other matters that make not only working with the MSA but the whole settlement process, tricky.

Tower is pleased to feature our Chief Compliance Officer Dan Anders, who will share tricks of the trade at a webinar on Wednesday, July 20, at 2:00 PM ET. Dan has written and submitted thousands of MSAs to CMS for almost two decades. His unique knowledge is an asset for anyone who uses an MSA in a case settlement.

A Q&A session will follow the presentation, and you can provide questions at the time you register. Please click the link below and register today!

REGISTER HERE

MSA Second Opinion Success Story – $46,691 in savings

June 23, 2022

This success story demonstrates how an MSA Second Opinion can lead to a successful result with settlement of a WC case.

CHALLENGE:

An MSA was prepared by another MSP provider for approximately $110,000. Based on this MSA amount, the parties reached a tentative settlement. Prior to MSA submission the other MSP provider revised the MSA to $145,500 which was outside the parties settlement range. The cost drivers in the MSA were injections, surgeries and physician visits.

SOLUTION:

Tower’s MSA 2nd opinion review found the injured worker had repeatedly declined injection therapy and one of the two surgeries had not been recommended in the past two years. Consequently, Tower recommended eliminating the surgery and injections from the MSA. Our Physician Follow Up service contacted the treating physician and obtained the physician’s written statement that injections were no longer part of the treatment plan.  The physician also agreed to reduce the number of physician visits to a single annual visit.

RESULTS:  $46,691 in Savings

In addition to eliminating a surgery that fell outside the two years of medical records required by CMS, injections were removed, and physician visit frequency was reduced yielding an MSA of $98,809. The MSA report was submitted and approved by CMS and the parties were able to move forward with settlement and claim closure.

Tower’s MSA 2nd Opinion, offered at no charge, identifies, from another MSP provider’s report, discrepancies and inappropriate treatment which unnecessarily increases the MSA along with recommending interventions which may result in a lower CMS-approved MSA amount.

Tower’s Physician Follow Up Service, also offered at no charge, reaches out to the treating physician to confirm ongoing Rx and reduce excessive or unneeded treatments.

More Tower Success Stories can be found here!